O
Cleveland
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock Automated License Plate Reader Contract

Cleveland

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (8)Opposed (11)

At a glance

Public comments
19
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 7, 2026.

Public comments (20)

OpposedSean McCannJul 7, 2026

ACLU representative urged rejection of the contract, citing mass surveillance concerns and data retention risks.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:34:31 →
OpposedJennifer BlakeneyJul 7, 2026

Argued that mass surveillance violates Fourth Amendment rights and that data is vulnerable to federal agencies and unauthorized searches.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 19:04 →
SupportiveMichael O'MalleyJul 7, 2026

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor urged council to support the technology, stating neighborhoods are safer with ALPRs given low police staffing levels.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 29:56 →
ConcernedBrenda BickerstaffJul 7, 2026

Expressed skepticism regarding police accountability and transparency in managing surveillance data.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 30:37 →
OpposedMary MaloneyJul 7, 2026

Cited documented security vulnerabilities and warrantless tracking concerns associated with Flock cameras.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 34:02 →
OpposedWalt GucicJul 7, 2026

Strongly opposed contract renewal due to mass surveillance concerns and lack of transparency.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 19:04 →
SupportiveAntoine KerriganJul 7, 2026

Supported the cameras for helping churches and communities deter break-ins and violence.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 41:28 →
SupportiveMark SmithJul 7, 2026

Garfield Heights councilman and pastor testified that ALPR cameras contributed to significant crime reductions in his city.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 44:28 →
SupportiveEugene WardJul 7, 2026

Stated that crime rates require effective safety tools while emphasizing the need for responsible data oversight.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 52:56 →
SupportivePrinceJul 7, 2026

Highlighted past murder investigations where camera footage helped capture suspects.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 55:01 →
OpposedRandy CunninghamJul 7, 2026

Expressed concern over the growing surveillance state and data overreach.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 58:36 →
OpposedChewyJul 7, 2026

Warned against surrendering data control to private companies and federal overreach.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:02:10 →
OpposedRebecca GarciaJul 7, 2026

Expressed deep concern that municipal surveillance data could intersect with federal immigration enforcement.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:08:11 →
OpposedTessa JuanJul 7, 2026

Objected to warrantless tracking and potential misuse by law enforcement.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:12:00 →
SupportiveTrevor ChandlerJul 7, 2026

Flock Safety representative detailed company guardrails, immigration filters, and local data ownership.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:15:49 →
SupportiveFran CalafetisJul 7, 2026

Shared an incident where neighborhood cameras helped police quickly track down perpetrators of a major theft.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:19:08 →
OpposedScott CaloJul 7, 2026

Cited reported instances of ALPR abuse nationwide and mistrust of vendor statements.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:25:08 →
OpposedJulianne RosemanJul 7, 2026

Stated that cameras do not prevent crime and urged investment in resident needs rather than for-profit tech companies.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:28:52 →
SupportiveLamont DobsonJul 7, 2026

CMSD Chief of Safety Security highlighted how school district ALPR cameras assisted in lockdown and weapons recovery situations.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:38:02 →
OpposedTerry WangJul 7, 2026

Former community police commissioner questioned police oversight capabilities and corporate profit motives.

Safety Committee — July 7, 2026 · 1:42:05 →