O
Cleveland
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock Safety Automated License Plate Reader Contract Renewal

Cleveland

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (9)

At a glance

Public comments
15
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 17, 2026.

Public comments (15)

OpposedScott CaloJun 17, 2026

Cited documented cases of ALPR abuse and misleading claims by surveillance vendors.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:33:11 →
OpposedRebecca CookJun 17, 2026

Argued that public funds should be invested in addressing root causes of crime like poverty rather than corporate surveillance.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:36:19 →
SupportiveVaughn RolandJun 17, 2026

Spoke as a representative for Flock Safety, highlighting the company's role in helping police departments combat officer shortages and solve crimes.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 50:42 →
SupportiveRonald James Jr.Jun 17, 2026

A retired Cleveland police detective with 33 years of experience spoke in favor of the Flock cameras, noting their value in combating crime and vehicle thefts.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:30:02 →
MixedPastor Aaron PhillipsJun 17, 2026

Spoke on behalf of the Cleveland clergy coalition, supporting safety but demanding full transparency and guardrails against data misuse or targeting of vulnerable populations.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 57:44 →
SupportiveBishop Eugene WardJun 17, 2026

Voiced support for the Flock cameras, emphasizing the toll of violent crime on the community and the need for regional tracking of criminals.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:00:52 →
SupportiveR.L. RenderJun 17, 2026

Shared a personal family tragedy involving a violent crime on Buckeye Road and argued that Cleveland needs all available technological tools to ensure safety.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:45:12 →
OpposedBrian AdamsJun 17, 2026

Opposed the Flock contract renewal, arguing that private tech companies profit from citizen data and that the system benefits out-of-state agencies more than Cleveland.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:52:28 →
OpposedTessa ExumJun 17, 2026

Expressed serious concerns about ALPR databases being used without warrants and shared examples of misuse by law enforcement officers in other states.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:13:51 →
OpposedChris VoglianoJun 17, 2026

Argued that mass surveillance undermines freedom and community trust, stating that safety and surveillance are not synonymous.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:14:30 →
OpposedJulianne RosemanJun 17, 2026

Highlighted technical and corporate concerns regarding private venture-backed surveillance companies prioritizing shareholders over residents.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:17:35 →
OpposedGraham BallJun 17, 2026

Expressed concern that Flock cameras could be used by federal immigration authorities to target vulnerable immigrant populations.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:20:49 →
OpposedStephanie ThomasJun 17, 2026

Shared frustrations regarding unaddressed human trafficking and street crime in her neighborhood despite existing cameras.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:25:33 →
OpposedDawn ZieglerJun 17, 2026

Voiced constitutional concerns regarding data ownership and changes to Flock's terms of service.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 1:28:22 →
MixedTony MinerJun 17, 2026

Spoke with mixed feelings as a pastor, acknowledging privacy risks while emphasizing the acute need to protect vulnerable community members from violent crime.

Safety Committee — June 17, 2026 · 2:27:16 →